« discussion | Main | news »
Saturday, February 28, 2009
Phase I Dosing for Cancer Drugs Detailed in New ICH Guidance
FDA
News Source
FDA draft guidance
Phase I clinical trials of cancer drugs can include maximum tolerated doses and dose-limiting toxicity, an International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) draft guidance says. The draft offers advice on conducting nonclinical studies of drugs intended for patients with advanced cancer and limited therapeutic options, along with suggestions for conducting Phase I clinical trials to assess drug safety. Comments are due April 20.
FDA and International Serious Adverse Events Consortium Release First Data on Genetic Basis of Adverse Drug Events
FDA
News Source
International
Serious Adverse Event Consortium
FDA’s
Critical Path Initiative
The first data offering health care professionals a better look into the genetic basis of certain types of adverse drug events was released today by the FDA and the International Serious Adverse Event Consortium (SAEC). The data are focused on the genetics associated with drug-induced serious skin rashes, such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, and helps better predict an individual’s risk of developing these reactions.
Both skin conditions appear as allergic-like skin reactions associated with blistering and peeling, and are considered life-threatening. Medications causing these serious allergic reactions should be discontinued; and if such signs and symptoms are not quickly recognized, these reactions can be fatal.
“The SAEC has fulfilled a key goal of the Critical Path Initiative by providing the research community with public access to new genomic data on adverse drug events,” said Janet Woodcock, M.D., director, the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “This consortium has taken a significant step forward by promoting open sharing of drug safety data. This type of cooperation has the potential to lead to more personalized approaches to medicine that can reduce a patient’s risk for experiencing an adverse drug event.”
The SAEC is a nonprofit partnership of pharmaceutical companies, the Wellcome Trust, and academic institutions focused on research relating to the genetics of drug-induced serious adverse events. The samples from the initial serious skin rash cases and matched controls were collected by GlaxoSmithKline plc, London, U.K., and donated to the consortium for this research.
By pooling these samples, the SAEC has identified numerous genetic associations that may contribute to an individual’s risk of developing serious drug-induced skin reactions. The data was compiled and analyzed just 16 months after the consortium was launched.
“We are pleased to be able to provide these invaluable data to the research community to both improve the productivity of drug development and to begin the critical process of developing validated biomarkers to forecast patients who may be at risk for drug-induced serious adverse events,” said Arthur Holden, founder and chairman of the SAEC. “We continue to believe the application of genomics to research the genetic basis of serious adverse events will prove to be one the most productive early applications of this technology.”
The consortium will publish its initial research results later this year.
Researchers who enter in to a data use agreement can obtain free access to the data to generate custom data inquiries and obtain immediate results on the genetic basis of adverse drug events.
Thursday, October 02, 2008
FDA Offers Advice on End of Phase IIa Meetings
The FDA is recommending that IND sponsors meet with the agency at the end of Phase IIa clinical trials to discuss dose estimation and selection for late-stage efficacy trials and whether novel trial designs would be useful, according to a new CDER draft guidance. The meeting also would allow sponsors to discuss critical data on drug interactions, studies in special populations defined by genetic characteristics or other biomarkers, and other pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic relationships.
The FDA is also recommending that IND sponsors meet with the agency at the end of Phase IIa clinical trials to discuss dose estimation and selection for late-stage efficacy trials and whether novel trial designs would be useful, according to a draft guidance from the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Comments on the draft are due Nov. 25.
Edited on: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:06 PM
Categories: guidelines
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Process Validation Guidance to Focus on Testing Upfront
The FDA will emphasize more oversight and batch testing in the early stages of drug commercialization in its revised guidance on process validation, according to Brian Hasselbalch, a consumer safety officer in CDER’s Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality.
Thursday, September 04, 2008
M3(R2) Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals
Updated draft
FDA Bioequivalence Guidelines Updated for Several Drugs
The FDA has updated its bioequivalence guidelines for several drugs as part of an effort to develop a full set of online product-specific bioequivalence recommendations that generic drug applicants can use instead of submitting requests for assistance in bioequivalence study design.